There is both good and bad news about this photograph:
Twenty-seven years ago, my parents traveled to Massachusetts and made a stop in the community of Indian Orchard, where, my father knew, his ancestors had lived for a time in the latter half of the nineteenth century. As it turned out, these French Canadian immigrants had descendants who still lived in the area, and thanks to the staff at Saint Aloysius Parish, he was able to connect with one such descendant. Later, he began corresponding with two more cousins, both of whom were kind enough to share their research about our shared French Canadian and Acadian ancestors. Family lore and even a few photographs were also exchanged – including this photocopied image thought to be a photograph of Marguerite (Chicoine) Adam (1816-1878).1
Marguerite Chicoine is one of the first ancestral names I learned as a child and amateur family historian. I loved hearing that she was said to be Native American – a bit of family lore since (mostly) disproven, but it did work quite effectively to capture my attention at the time. I had always hoped to see the original of this photograph that was sent to us by our late cousin, but learned two years ago that an original may no longer exist. Apparently, when she was moved to a nursing home, her family history materials were thrown out.2 This serves as an important reminder to make an estate plan for the preservation of your own family history materials.
While I can’t rule out that somewhere out there, a cousin might hold another copy of this same photograph – that fortunate scenario has happened before – it’s also possible that this is the only version of this photograph that I will ever see. In any case, let’s take a look. Could this realistically be a photograph of Marguerite Chicoine?
Marguerite died in Massachusetts in 1878 at the age of 62.3 Thus, this photograph would have to predate 1878. As the photocopy indicates that this was a carte de visite – most popular between approximately 1860 and 1866 – that is entirely possible.4 All of Marguerite’s fifteen known children were born before 1862, with the exception of her youngest, who was born five years later. As Marguerite relocated with her family from Quebec to Massachusetts circa 1864-65, it seems plausible that she may have had her picture taken during this time period as a memento to share with relatives at home.5
Marguerite was fifty years old when her youngest child was born at the tail end of the most likely timeframe for this photograph; in order to have had a healthy pregnancy so late, perhaps she had a more youthful appearance than one might otherwise imagine for a mother of fifteen. The woman appears to have dark hair without noticeable graying, and her dark complexion and strong nose make it easy to see how rumors of significant Native American ancestry could have gotten started. However, I find it difficult to get a sense for her age, due in part to the poor quality of the image. Could she be over forty-five, or is this woman in fact decades younger?
Marguerite did have three daughters who would have reached adulthood by the 1860s: Marguerite Adam, Marie Adam, and Julienne Adam.6 While I do have a photograph of Marguerite, who does not appear to be a match, could this photograph show instead either Marie or Julienne as a young woman in her early to mid-twenties?
The woman wears a buttoned shirtwaist with a windowpane pattern, the sleeves neither significantly fitted nor puffed, and a high linen band collar is visible.7 Her belted skirt is of a straightforward design. Notably, it is not worn with a fashionable hoop as one would typically expect in the 1860s; this more unassuming skirt would perhaps have been in line with what a woman in rural Quebec or an immigrant in a New England mill town might wear.8 The backdrop is similarly domestic in style with a practical wooden chair and what looks to be a fireplace.
The good news? This could be a photograph of Marguerite Chicoine. It depicts a dark-complected woman of evidently simple means who was photographed in the 1860s, a physical description, socioeconomic background, and timeline that fit with what is known about Marguerite.
The bad news? We may never know for sure. It seems equally plausible that could be a photograph of one of Marguerite’s daughters or a close relative. Lacking an original for closer examination, it can still be hoped that another copy of this photograph might exist in different branch of the family, and that it may hold additional clues regarding the true identification of the mysterious dark-haired Québécois.
Copyright © 2015 Melanie Frick. All Rights Reserved.
1 Grave of Marguerite Chicoine, 1816-1878, Saint Aloysius Cemetery, Indian Orchard, Hampden County, Massachusetts; photograph by Brian Adam, 1987, privately held by Brian Adam.
2 L.D. to Melanie Frick, letter, 10 November 2012; privately held by Melanie Frick.
3 “Massachusetts, Springfield Vital Records, 1638-1887,” digital image, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org : accessed 20 January 2014), Marguerite Adam, 12 September 1878, Springfield.
4 Georgen Gilliam Charnes, “Cartes-de-Visite: The First Pocket Photographs,” Nantucket Historical Association, 2004 (http://www.nha.org/history/keepinghistory/KHcdv.htm : accessed 1 November 2013).
5 “U.S, City Directories, 1821-1989,” database, Ancestry.com (http://www.ancestry.com : accessed 20 January 2014), entry for Timothy Adams; citing “Springfield, Massachusetts, City Directory, 1865,”and 1870 U.S. census, Hampden County, Massachusetts, population schedule, Springfield Ward 8, p. 33 (penned), dwelling 174, family 236, Margaret Adams; digital image, Ancestry.com (http://www.ancestry.com : accessed 20 January 2014), citing National Archives microfilm M593, roll 618.
6 1851 Canada census, Saint Hyacinthe County, Quebec, population schedule, St. Pie, District Number 31, Sub-District 404, page 29, line 45, Marguerite Chicoine; digital image, Ancestry.com (http://www.ancestry.com : accessed 20 January 2014), citing Census of 1851 (Canada East, Canada West, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia), Library and Archives of Canada, Ottawa.
7 Joan Severa, Dressed for the Photographer: Ordinary Americans and Fashion, 1840-1900 (Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press, 1997), 197.
8 Severa, Dressed for the Photographer, 263.
Fascinating research and reporting as always, Melanie. I think such potentially lost information is always disheartening. People seem to keep the “stuff” and throw the truly valuable information. Further, unidentified pictures, even when one has the originals, are each an untold story.
Absolutely – I couldn’t agree more. Thanks for your kind comment, Kevin!
so interesting! thank you Melanie! such care and thought in your research… I live very near Indian Orchard (part of Springfield) there is a wonderful museum and historical society there; let me know if you want me to polk around a bit some rainy weekend afternoon….
Thanks, Alice! I might just take you up on that one of these days… :)
Pingback: Tombstone Tuesday: Timothy and Odile (Millette) Adam | Homestead Genealogical Research
Pingback: The Adam Brothers | Homestead Genealogical Research
Pingback: A Full House in a Mill Town | Homestead Genealogy